Super members searching for a ‘sustainable’ investment fund are exposed to the same challenges as those in more traditional funds with the sector delivering a wide range of performance outcomes and charging a range of fees, according to new research on the sector by superannuation research house SuperRatings.
The SuperRatings research reveals that the median performance of ‘sustainable’ investment funds is lower than the median performance of the SuperRatings SR50 Balanced (60-76) Index, comprised of traditional balanced super funds. Furthermore, the ‘sustainable’ funds have higher median fees. The combination of the two means a sizeable number of ‘sustainable’ funds produce sub-optimal returns at relatively high fee levels. ‘Sustainable’ funds include funds that select their investments based on environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors.
However, there are a number of ‘sustainable’ funds that outperform the market, while some also have lower fees than many Balanced options. The chart below reveals that the top quartile of sustainable funds charges a total fee of $519 or less per annum on a balance of $50,000, compared to the median SR50 Balanced (60-76) Index fee of $606. Looking at returns, the top quartile of ‘sustainable’ funds has delivered a 10-year return of 8.9% or more per annum, which is in line with the SR50 Balanced (60-76) Index.
Source: SuperRatings
The below table shows the top returning super funds that are classified as sustainable due to the fund’s incorporation of ESG and socially responsible investing criteria. HESTA’s Eco Pool balanced option has delivered the top return over 10 years of 11.1% per annum, which is considerably higher than the SR50 Balanced (60-76) Index return of 8.9% per annum.
| Fund | Total fee on $50k balance |
10-year return (% p.a.) |
| HESTA – Eco Pool | $670 | 11.1% |
| VicSuper FutureSaver – Socially Conscious Option | $463 | 10.3% |
| AustralianSuper – Socially Aware | $448 | 10.0% |
| WA Super Super Solutions Pers – Sustainable Future | $573 | 9.5% |
| UniSuper Accum (1) – Sustainable Balanced | $281 | 9.3% |
| Sustainable Balanced option median | $662 | 8.5% |
| SR50 Balanced (60-76) Index median | $606 | 8.9% |
Returns over 10 years to 28 February 2019
Source: SuperRatings
There are a range of factors that must be taken into account when assessing the extent to which ESG factors affect a fund’s investment decisions, as well as the cost involved. For example, some funds may apply a simple screen on certain industries, while others may conduct more in-depth analysis on individual businesses, which may justify a higher fee. This makes it difficult to provide a definitive ranking of sustainable fund performance.
When considering sustainable alternatives, it is important to look at each individual fund’s mandate, their process for investing sustainably, and of course the industries and businesses they do and do not invest in,” said Mr Rappell.
“When we speak to financial advisers, they tell us that ESG factors are becoming more and more important for their clients. Advisers need the capability to examine and compare sustainable funds to ensure that the product is the best fit for their client both in terms of their risk and return preferences, as well as their social and environmental values.”
Gordon Toy
03 9623 6373
Gordon.Toy@lonsec.com.au
17 Jul 2019 - Super funds have had a convincing finish to what was a bumpy 2019 financial year, with an improvement in sentiment and a rallying share market in June ...
15 May 2019 - Super funds have failed to be rattled by the softening economic outlook, delivering solid returns in April and boosted by market momentum through early May. ...
17 Apr 2019 - Despite a recovery in the March quarter, superannuation funds are heading for a disappointing 2018-19 financial year, with global growth challenges and a ...
